SBenegaL

Blog

  • Work Design and Well-being

    In the last byte, we looked at how JDS could be used to redesign jobs. In today’s byte, we discuss about Work Design and Well-being.

    Organizations need to redesign jobs in order to increase worker control and reduce worker uncertainty, while at the same time time remembering to manage conflicts and task/job demands. 

    Following are some ways in which control in work organizations could be increased:
    1. Workers would be given the opportunity to control several aspects of the work and the work place
    2. Designing machines and tasks for optmal response times and/or ranges
    3. Implementing performance-monitoring systems as a source of relevant feedback
    To reduce uncertainty we could use the following:
    1. Providing employees with timely and complete information needed for the work
    2. Making clear and unambiguous work assignments
    3. Improving communication at shift change time
    4. Increasing employee access to information source
    Conflicts could be managed by:
    1. Participative decision making to reduce conflict
    2. Using supportive supervisory styles to resolve conflicts
    3. Having sufficient resources available to meet work demands

  • Redesigning Jobs

    In the last byte, we looked at the moderation effect in the Job Characteristic model. In today’s byte, we look at some uses of this theory in redesigning jobs.

    Job Characteristic theory added a more comprehensive perspective in the design of jobs. The JDS developed was useful in job redesign efforts through one of the fived implementation concepts:
    1. Combining tasks into larger jobs
    2. Forming natural work teams to increase task identity and task significance
    3. Establishing relationships with customers
    4. Loading jobs vertically with more responsibility
    5. Opening feedback channels for the job incumbent
    Job Characteristics Inventory (JCI) is an alternative to the Job Characteristics Model but is not as comprehensive. JCI doesnt include coritical psychological states, personal and work outcomes, or employee needs.

  • Job Characteristic Theory – 4

    In the last byte, we looked at how we could calculate MPS based on a assessment tool. In today’s byte we discuss the job characteristic theory a bit further. 

    The Job Characteristics Model includes growth need strength as moderator in the model. It is seen that people with high growth need strength respond favorably to jobs with high MPSs, and individuals with low growth need strength respond less favorably to such jobs.

    The theory suggests that core job dimensions stimulate three critical psychological states according to the relationships specified in the model. These critical psychological states are defined as follows:
    • Experienced Meaningfulness of the work: the degree to which the employee experiences the job as one that is generally meaningful, valuable, and worthwhile.
    • Experienced responsibility for work outcomes: the degree to which the employee feels personally accountable and responsibile for the results of the work he or she does.
    • Knowledge of results: the degree to which the employee knows and understands, on a continuous basis, how effectively he or she is performing the job.
    We shall continue  the discuss further in the next byte.

  • Determining Job Characteristics

    In the last byte, we defined the various core job characteristics. In today’s byte, we begin looking at the concept of Motivating Potential Scores (MPS). 

    Motivating Potential Scores (MPS) indicates a job’s potential for motivating incumbents. Hackman and his collegues built the following equation to measure MPS:

             [skill variety] + [task identity] + [task significance]
    MPS = ————————————————————- x [Autonomy] x [Feedback]
                                               3
     
    [Refer to the reference book to measure these individual components]
     
    The model includes growth need strength (refers to the desire to grow and fully develop one’s ability) as a moderator.  People with high growth need strength respond favorably to jobs with high MPSs, and those with low growth need strength respond less favorably to such jobs.
     
    We shall continue the discussion in the next byte.

  • Job Characteristics Theory 3

    In the last byte, we looked at the diagramatic representation of the Job Characterictics Model. In today’s byte, we look at some of the definitions related to the five core job characteristics:

    • Skill Variety: refers to the degree to which a job includes different activitites and involves the use of multiple skills and talkents of the employee.
    • Task Identity: refers to the degree to which the job requires completion of a whole and identifiable piece of work – that is, doing a job from beginning to end with a tangible outcome.
    • Task Significance: refers to the degree to which the job has a substantial impact on the lives or work of toher people, whether in the immediate organization or in the external environment.
    • Autonomy: refers to the degree to which the job provides the employee with substantial freedom, independence, and discretion in scheduling the work and in determining the procedures to be used in carrying it out.
    • Feedback from the job itself: refers to the degree to which carrying out the work activities result in the employee’s obtaining direct and clear information about the effectiveness of his or her performance.

  • Job Characteristics Theory 2

    In the last byte, we began our discussion on Job Characteristics Theory. We continue and look at the visual representation of the Job Charactertistics Model. 

    Job Characteristics Model is a framework for understanding person – job fit through the interaction of core job dimensions with critical psychological states within a person. To measure the elements of the Job Characteristic Model a survey was developed – Job Diagonostic Survey (JDS).

    Following is the model:

    We shall discuss the five core job characteristics and their definitions in the next byte.

  • Job Characteristics Theory

    In the last byte, we looked at Job Enrichment and how to involve it into the design of an organization.  In today’s byte, we begin our discussion on Job Characteristics Theory. 

    The Job Characteristics theory was initiated in the mid 1960s and also falls into the theoretical approach to the work design but has significant departure from the three earlier approaches discussed already – Scientific Method, Job Enlargement, and Job Enrichment. 

    This theory emphasizes the interaction between the individual and specific attributes of the job; it is a person-job fit model and is not a universal theory. Through research there were four core characteristics of job:
    • Job Variety
    • Autonomy
    • Responsibility
    • Interpersonal Industries
    The study had found that the core job characteristics did not affect all workers in the same way.
     
    This initial model was further modified through the research by Prof Richard Hickman and his colleagues and created the model that we would discuss in this series.

  • Job Enrichment

    In the last byte, we looked at job enlargement and job rotation. In today’s byte, we look at job enrichment. 

    Job enlargement achieves a better job design through horizontal loading. Job Enrichment on the other hand, increases the amount of vertical loading (through increased job responsibility).
     
    Job Enrichment is a job design or redesign method aimed at increasing the motivational factors in a job. It builds on Herzberg’s two-factor theory of motivation. Job enlargement recommends increasing and varying the number of activities a person does, job enrichment recommends increasing the recognition, responsibility, and opportunity for achievement.
     
    Some people prefer simple jobs. Once jobs are selected for enrichment, management should brainstorm about possible changes; revise the list to include only specific changes related to motivational factors, and screen out generalities and suggestions that would simply increase activities or number of tasks.
     
    Two key problems when implementing Job Enrichment are —

    1. First, an initial drop in performance can be expected as workers accommodate to change
    2. Second, supervisors may experience some anxiety or hostility as a result of employees’ increased responsibility.

  • Job Enlargement and Job Rotation

    In the last byte, we looked at the scientific management approach to job design. In today’s byte, we look at Job Enlargement and Job Rotation.
    Job Enlargement is a method of job design that increases the number of activities in a job to overcome the boredom of overspecialized work.
    Job Rotation is a variation of job enlargement in which workers are exposed to a variety of specialized jobs over time.
    The limitations of the overspecialization viz:
    ⦁    lack of variety
    ⦁    under stimulation and underutilization
    Workers would be more stimulated and better utilized by increasing the variety in the jobs.
    Job rotation and cross-training (a variation of job enlargement in which workers are trained in different specialized tasks or activities) are variations of job enlargement. All three kinds of programs horizontally enlarge jobs, that is, the number and variety of an employee’s tasks and activities are increased.

  • Scientific Method of Job Design

    In the last byte, we initiated the discussion on some of the traditional approaches to Job Design. In today’s byte, we look the Scientific Method of job design.
     
    The genesis of the scientific management approach is attributed to Frederick Taylor, and emphasizes on Work Simplification.
     
    Work Simplification refers to “Standardization and the narrow, explicit specification of task activities for workers.”
     
    Through scientific management, jobs are often designed to have limited number of tasks, and each task is scientifically specified so that worker is not required to think of deliberate. (The management calibrates and defines task carefully, and the worker only executes the task).
     
    Some of the elements of scientific management are – time and motion studies, differential piece-rate systems to pay, the scientific selection of workers, and focus on the efficient use of labor for the economic benefits of the corporation.
     
    2 arguments that support the efficient and standardized approach to job design are:
    1. Work simplification allowed workers of diverse ethnic and skill backgrounds to work together in a scientific way.
    2. Work simplification also leads to production efficiency in the organization and therefore to higher profits.
    The limitation of this approach is that it undervalues the human capacity for thought and ingenuity. Failure to fully utilize the workers’ capacity in a constructive fashion may cause a variety of work problems.